Facebook and What its Worth

January 3rd

There has been a tremendous amount of interest in one financial event that opened the first Monday of the new year. Goldman Sachs and a Russian investor, Digital Sky, invested $500 million in Facebook. This is interesting on so many levels that it’s hard to pick the most important implication.

  • There is the question that the market led with – is this $50 billion valuation justified?
  • There is the question of “secondary markets” and whether the $1.5 billion that Goldman states that it is going to raise next is anything other than the thing that the SEC says is the focus of its “inquiry.”
  • There is Goldman’s reasoning in taking on this particular issue at this time.

All of this is interesting. But the comment to which I keep returning was the one from Erin Burnett on CNBC’s Morning Joe. Erin pointed out that if Facebook is valued at $50 billion then its being valued at more than Boeing.

This comment led to a discussion with Joe Scarborough about companies that “make things” and companies, like Facebook, that make “nothing.”

The part of this that I find so interesting is the question of valuation in the digital age. I can imagine a number of reasons that Goldman might have granted Facebook a valuation of astonishing magnitude. At least half of the reasons would make you nervous that the regulators or the culture could keep up with the new “bubble.” But putting these issues aside, the even more interesting question to me is to imagine the value of Web 2.0. Where is Facebook going and what will be possible for companies like this? Sitting in front of a computer screen as we all do every day, the possibilities for the future of an institution that can make connections among people who have not (literally) seen one another for 40 years is astonishing.

The future is more about watching the “crowd” find its voice.

Category
Tags
Comments

Comments

  1. Kethiri says:

    Found your site on Google. This is a cool post. I’d like to see you take the main idea from this article and cretae another second article, and maybe you could embed a vid, also?

  2. Sorry… I could only watch the first clip and second clip. Really? A few questions for you Martin.,1. Does TV3 show porn at 6.00?2. Does TVNZ produce significantly better local programmes than TV3?3. When was Anne Tolley proved lying?4. What is wrong with the National scandals?5. What are the 'real issues' that John Key and the National government haven't addressed?

  3. Sanal tuş ile ilgili yorumlarımı yukarıda verdim burada tekrarlamak istemiyorum Murat bey.Benim kısaca söylemek istediğim şey, bu anlattığınız eksikler tabiki, sadece bu platformu bağlar fakat anlatımınızda sanki diğer 2 platform ile kıyaslanmış ve bunlar eksik gibi gösterilmiş olarak algılanıyor. Ve bunun yanlış olduğuydu.H simgesi ise 2 yıldır var telefonlarda:)Yazdıklarımda hata ayıklayıp bana cevap hakkı doğuracak şeyler yazmanızı ve polemik oluşturmak istemediğim için kısa kesiyorum. Yanlış anlaşılmak istemiyorum. Kolay gelsin iyi çalışmalar

  4. Il faut être prudent avec les redirections 301, car le pingouin veille. En effet ce sont des redirections définitives, à ne pas confondre avec les redirections temporaires 302. J’en ai fait la douloureuse expérience il y a quelques mois, avec divers changement de 301 qui ont fait chuter un de mes sites sur plusieurs mots clé importants.

  5. http://www./ says:

    You may fight with the world but you know there is someone who is going to protect u from all odds and that feeling itself is so beautiful n safe… thats what makes our dear Dads so special…

Leave a Comment